Jump to content
DiamondCentric
  • MLB News & Analysis

    Hawk-Eye At The Plate: What Fans Need To Know About The Automated Ball-Strike Challenge System

    Two challenges, 15-second reviews, and a whole lot of drama -- here is how the Automated Ball-Strike system will work on Opening Day.

    Matthew Nethercott
    Image courtesy of Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

    MLB Video

    MLB is getting another rule change. The 2026 season will feature the Automated Ball-Strike system for the first time in regular-season play. Baseball has been using the system at various levels of the minor leagues for several years and gave major league players a taste of it in spring training of 2025.

    How The Automated Ball-Strike Challenge System (ABS) Works

    Unlike a full robot umpire system, where every pitch is called by a computer, the challenge system keeps the human umpire as the primary official. The ABS system uses 12 Hawk-Eye cameras around the stadium to track the ball's flight path with a margin of error of about 1/6 of an inch. Each batter is assigned an individualized, two-dimensional strike zone based on their measured height: the top of the zone is set at 53.5% of the player's height, while the bottom is at 27%.

    Under the rules for 2026, only the pitcher, catcher, or batter can initiate a challenge. They will do so by tapping their hat or helmet immediately after a call. Each team starts the game with two challenges. If the challenge is successful and the call is overturned, the team retains the challenge. If the call is upheld, the challenge is lost. To maintain the pace of play, the entire process is designed to be nearly instantaneous, with a 5G-powered graphic showing the pitch location on the stadium scoreboard and broadcast within approximately 15 seconds.

    The Benefit Of The ABS Challenge System Players

    As with all systems and new rules, there are positives and negatives. For players with elite plate discipline, like Aaron Judge, the ABS acts as an equalizer. Historically, taller players often get the low strikes called on them that are technically balls but look like strikes to a human umpire. By using a standardized zone tailored to a player’s specific height, the system rewards hitters who truly know the strike zone and pitchers who can paint the corners with surgical precision. It removes the frustration of a high-leverage moment being decided by a clearly missed call, ensuring that the game's outcome is determined by the players' performance rather than officiating errors.

    The most significant downside is the potential death of pitch framing. Pitch framing is like an art where catchers subtly move their mitts to give the umpire a good look at strikes, and to make shadow pitches (just outside the zone) appear inside the strike zone. Elite defensive catchers have built entire careers on getting as many strikes as possible for their pitchers, but since the ABS cameras track the ball as it passes through the zone -- regardless of where the catcher catches it -- this skill becomes less valuable. The shift could lead teams to prioritize offensive-minded catchers who lack defensive finesse, potentially changing the position's archetype and removing a classic chess-match element between the catcher and the home plate umpire. Pitch framing won't be fully obsolete because if teams run out of challenges early in games, catchers can still steal strikes late in games.

    The ABS system is going to revolutionize the way the game is played, and fans will fall in love with it when their favorite team benefits from the calls that get changed as a result.

    Follow DiamondCentric For Major League Baseball News & Analysis

    Like what you've read here? Check out our team-specific sites and expand your fandom!

    Recent MLB Articles

    Recent MLB Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    45 minutes ago, Parfigliano said:

    Pitch framing is BS.  The death of it is a death to be celebrated.

    I mean, it's not BS. People constantly talk about pitch framing as "stealing strikes". That's half, maybe less, of pitch framing. Guys like Ryan Doumit lost TONS of strikes because they presented the ball so poorly to the umpire.

    Pitch framing is about getting as many strikes called as possible. Many of those are legitimate strikes that deserve to be called as such.

    6 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    I mean, it's not BS. People constantly talk about pitch framing as "stealing strikes". That's half, maybe less, of pitch framing. Guys like Ryan Doumit lost TONS of strikes because they presented the ball so poorly to the umpire.

    Pitch framing is about getting as many strikes called as possible. Many of those are legitimate strikes that deserve to be called as such.

    On this we disagree.

    I believe it's agent pushed mumbo jumbo dressed up as a metric to increase the value of Cs that can't hit come contract time.

    10 hours ago, Parfigliano said:

    On this we disagree.

    I believe it's agent pushed mumbo jumbo dressed up as a metric to increase the value of Cs that can't hit come contract time.

    Weird that it's agent-pushed, but was mostly developed by the Tampa Bay Rays. They were WAY ahead of the curve on framing, and then everyone else had to catch up.



    If you have an account on one of the following sites, you have a DiamondCentric account.

    Twins Daily, Brewer Fanatic, North Side Baseball, Talk Sox, Jays Centre, Padres Mission, Royals Keep, Grand Central Mets, Fish On First.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...