Jump to content
DiamondCentric
  • MLB News & Analysis

    MLB’s Latest CBA Proposal Could Dramatically Change Free Agency

    Owners proposed a condensed offseason calendar, along with changes to roster management, injured lists, and the Rule 5 Draft.

    Matthew Nethercott
    Image courtesy of Mike Watters-Imagn Images

    MLB Video

    MLB owners have submitted yet another proposal to the players' association for new terms in the upcoming CBA negotiations, one that the owners believe is in the best interest of baseball fans. The MLBPA rejected the proposal, but some of the clauses could come up later in negotiations and perhaps be rules in the future. 

    Changes to Rosters & Injured Lists

    The owners suggest that each team submit a 26-man roster every Monday, one that lasts throughout the week for fans to be more connected to the players they are rooting for. The only exception the owners suggest is for injuries to players, trades, and waiver claims. 

    The proposal also suggests changes to the MLB injured list that require hitters to be on the IL for one week and pitchers to be on the IL for a minimum of two weeks, and the 60-day IL would be changed to the 12-week IL. This would be beneficial to both teams for more clarity on predicting IL timelines and fans for the same reason.

    Changes to the Rule 5 Draft

    The latest proposals also suggest that minor league player eligibility for the Rule 5 Draft be moved up one year and that players selected in the draft could be optioned to the minor leagues. This would present pathways for prospects other organizations see something in but might not fit on their major league roster right away, especially relievers. 

    An Offseason Calendar

    Something that has been proposed in the past comes up once again. The proposal suggests an offseason calendar that would consist of a "quiet period" from the World Series to the beginning of the winter meetings, during which teams would be allowed to sign only their own free agents or make trades with other teams. Under this model, free agency would open at midnight on the Monday of the winter meetings and conclude on December 21st, giving way to a full frozen period until the first Monday of February.

    This could be engaging for fans because, like other sports, it would create an absolute frenzy around offseason action. The players have rejected this in the past because it takes leverage away from them in contract negotiations.

    The MLBPA's Rejection

    In a (not-so) shocking development, the MLBPA rejected the proposal from the owners, citing that "MLB expressly conditioned these proposals on the players’ agreement to a salary cap system, which would drastically reduce overall player compensation, eliminate fully guaranteed contracts through escrow, and turn back the clock on fundamental player rights. " 

    While an offseason calendar and amending the Rule 5 draft would certainly look better framed by the already proposed and rejected salary cap, they could still be accepted without a salary cap, though it does not seem likely. The most likely of the clauses to be accepted would be the changes to the injured list, but that remains to be seen.

    Statement from Interim Executive Director Bruce Meyer pic.twitter.com/iOMoCZmROY

    — MLBPA (@MLBPA) August 27, 2026

     

    Follow DiamondCentric For Major League Baseball News & Analysis

    Like what you've read here? Check out our team-specific sites and expand your fandom!

    Recent MLB Articles

    Recent MLB Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    17 hours ago, NYCTK said:

    The owners should drop their threats of killing a season of baseball in order to get an unnecessary labor restriction. The players are under no obligation to consider any proposal that requires a salary cap, something they've been adamant about rejecting forever.

    Until the greedy scum billionaire owners accept that, there will not be baseball. 

    The question is, are the owners prepared to lose billions of dollars in order to get a salary cap? It sure seems like the players union is. Not to mention the hit to future revenue and growth from the owners perspective. The union has already dug in it seems with comments from several players.

    1 hour ago, TNtwins85 said:

    The question is, are the owners prepared to lose billions of dollars in order to get a salary cap? It sure seems like the players union is. Not to mention the hit to future revenue and growth from the owners perspective. The union has already dug in it seems with comments from several players.

    I truly don't think they are. They'll pretend to be up until late February. 

    • Like 1
    14 hours ago, Luis Claro said:

    Bueno،respondiendo al comentario sobre los contratos diferentes y el pago de impuestos de los mismos es una situación de ver que dicen las leyes sobre los contratos diferentes y que hacer en casos similares al de Otany si decidir residir en Japón No es justo que no pague los impuestos de lo ganado en su contrato Sobre la disputa de las negociaciones del nuevo contrato laboral entre multimillonarios (dueños) y ricos (jugadores),habría que tocar eso de los contratos y los demás temas que tienen ambas partes Todo consiste en cerrar las brechas Lo justo es lo justo No conozco las reglas del IRS con la MLB،pero no creo que haya diferencia con otras empresas،gremios y diferentes tipos de negocios y empleados،como a dicho esta persona en su comentario,Con el mayor respeto, me cuesta creerlo Yo...de verdad¡¡¡No lo puedo creer!!"Habría que reacer las normas y reglas con la MLB y el sindicato para evitar la evasión de impuestos Nosotros los aficionados estmos rezando para que no se produzca otra huelga que pone en riesgo la proxima temporada por la avaricia (con el perdón de todos) que tanto daño causa a aquellos trabajadores que viven de un salario insignificante comparado con esos contratos de millones,incluso los que ya están alrrededor de arbitraje salarial

    Bueno... se podía hacer otro arbitraje con tres jueces،cada uno con su asesor .

    Es decir un panel  de tres jueces que se encargarán de mediar en un punto específico de las negociaciones y así evitar el paro laborar que tanto daño hace,no solo en lo económico,si no también a los aficionados que disfrutamos y amamos el baseball 

    Seguiré opinando mientras pueda sobre el cierre patrona y sus consecuencias

    A Spanish speaker! Welcome! Here is a Claude translation of this post:

    Well, responding to the comment about the different contracts and the payment of taxes on them — it's a matter of seeing what the laws say about different contracts and what to do in cases similar to Otany's [Ohtani's], if he decides to reside in Japan. It's not fair that he doesn't pay taxes on what he earned under his contract.

    Regarding the dispute over the negotiations for the new labor contract between billionaires (owners) and the rich (players), the contracts and the other issues both sides have would need to be addressed. It all comes down to closing the gaps. Fair is fair.

    I don't know the IRS rules regarding MLB, but I don't think there's any difference from other companies, unions, and different types of businesses and employees, as this person has said in their comment. With the greatest respect, I find it hard to believe. I... really — I can't believe it!! The rules and regulations with MLB and the union would need to be redone to prevent tax evasion.

    We fans are praying that there won't be another strike putting next season at risk because of the greed (with everyone's pardon) that does so much harm to those workers who live on an insignificant salary compared to those million-dollar contracts — including those who are already around salary arbitration.

    Well... another kind of arbitration could be set up, with three judges, each with their own advisor. That is, a panel of three judges who would be responsible for mediating on a specific point in the negotiations, and thus avoid the work stoppage that does so much damage — not only economically, but also to the fans who enjoy and love baseball.

    I'll keep sharing my opinion for as long as I can about the lockout and its consequences.

    • Like 1
    6 hours ago, NYCTK said:

    I truly don't think they are. They'll pretend to be up until late February. 

    Logically it doesn’t make sense but who knows. Running it through AI a 94 equivalent work stoppage would amount to somewhere between 7-10 billion dollars lost between the owners and players not to mention the hit they take year over year after. I just don’t see that happening even if it’s half as bad as 94. I could be wrong.

    5 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    A Spanish speaker! Welcome! Here is a Claude translation of this post:

    Well, responding to the comment about the different contracts and the payment of taxes on them — it's a matter of seeing what the laws say about different contracts and what to do in cases similar to Otany's [Ohtani's], if he decides to reside in Japan. It's not fair that he doesn't pay taxes on what he earned under his contract.

    Regarding the dispute over the negotiations for the new labor contract between billionaires (owners) and the rich (players), the contracts and the other issues both sides have would need to be addressed. It all comes down to closing the gaps. Fair is fair.

    I don't know the IRS rules regarding MLB, but I don't think there's any difference from other companies, unions, and different types of businesses and employees, as this person has said in their comment. With the greatest respect, I find it hard to believe. I... really — I can't believe it!! The rules and regulations with MLB and the union would need to be redone to prevent tax evasion.

    We fans are praying that there won't be another strike putting next season at risk because of the greed (with everyone's pardon) that does so much harm to those workers who live on an insignificant salary compared to those million-dollar contracts — including those who are already around salary arbitration.

    Well... another kind of arbitration could be set up, with three judges, each with their own advisor. That is, a panel of three judges who would be responsible for mediating on a specific point in the negotiations, and thus avoid the work stoppage that does so much damage — not only economically, but also to the fans who enjoy and love baseball.

    I'll keep sharing my opinion for as long as I can about the lockout and its consequences.

    The problem is really that MLB and the owners are trying to force a problem-reaction-solution down the players and fans’ throats when in all actuality what they are trying to accomplish is more money in their pockets which is what a salary cap does whether people realize it or not. The players have a union which is gonna fight to keep or gain more of that pie but MLB is gonna try to pigeon hole them into a floor with a cap. This just like everything else in the corporate world leaves the consumer holding the bag. The game could be improved without the different avenues of sharing money. Parity could be achieved with a few simple rule changes in the form of carrots and sticks instead of dollars. One needs to look no further than a Forbes list of the most valuable franchises. It’s dominated by NFL and NBA teams. Why? Because they have caps and floors. It’s just one avenue to fix a not so big problem but for sure benefits MLB, the owners and to a lower extent the players. At the end of that list is the fans/consumers. 




    If you have an account on one of the following sites, you have a DiamondCentric account.

    Twins Daily, Brewer Fanatic, North Side Baseball, Talk Sox, Jays Centre, Padres Mission, Royals Keep, Grand Central Mets, Fish On First.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...