Jump to content
DiamondCentric
  • MLB News & Analysis

    MLB's New Salary Cap Proposal Could Make Looming Lockout Even More Complicated

    Major League Baseball has proposed higher payroll limits, earlier free agency and an increased minimum salary, but its continued push for a salary cap remains a major obstacle in labor negotiations.

    Matthew Nethercott
    Image courtesy of Benny Sieu-Imagn Images

    MLB Video

    Major League Baseball’s offseason is now underway, and we are less than a month from baseball’s doomsday. On December 1st, MLB’s CBA will expire, and a long winter, and possibly spring, of labor fighting will begin. Tuesday, the owners released a new proposal for a salary cap/floor system that sent baseball fans into a frenzy.

    About the new proposal

    According to Jeff Passan of ESPN, MLB would delay the implementation of a salary cap until the 2028 season; this way, teams can operate as needed this offseason to get players signed and keep the market moving. The cap would be raised from the initial $245.3 million to $258.2 million, and the floor would rise from $171.2 million to $180.2 million per season.

    The road to free agency would also be reduced from six years to five, and the league minimum salary would rise from $780 thousand to $1 million per season. The proposal also notes that it would limit the number of times a player could be optioned to the minor leagues per season from five times to four. This would also eliminate the qualifying offer, which means teams would not be in jeopardy of losing draft picks for signing players. The weekly roster idea was also revisited, with the statement noting that teams would not be able to outright a player during a week they are on the roster.

    Benefits and Drawbacks

    One of the biggest benefits would be pre-arbitration players being paid more. If there were a salary cap/floor system, it would help boost the payrolls of the 12 teams that need to get theirs above the proposed mark. Lowering the number of years until free agency would also benefit players, as it might allow them to earn more money on free-agent deals. Eliminating the qualifying offer would also guarantee that players reach the open market, which is also a good thing.

    The drawback remains the constant push for a salary cap/floor system. The players have yet to show interest in signing on to a salary cap, and I doubt the marginal increases in the cap/floor numbers will change this. Continuing to propose this is increasingly making it likely there will be a longer lockout this offseason. The proposals need to be realistic, and given the players' refusal to accept a cap/floor system, this is not realistic. 

    These proposals are just getting started, and this labor war could get ugly before realistic items are proposed and items are resolved.

    Follow DiamondCentric For Major League Baseball News & Analysis

    Like what you've read here? Check out our team-specific sites and expand your fandom!

    Recent MLB Articles

    Recent MLB Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    If you have an account on one of the following sites, you have a DiamondCentric account.

    Twins Daily, Brewer Fanatic, North Side Baseball, Talk Sox, Jays Centre, Padres Mission, Royals Keep, Grand Central Mets, Fish On First.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...