The poll attached for “floor or cap”, decision has to go hand in hand IMO. Desperately need both!
Choosing your opponent is ridiculous to me. I guess I’d be OK with it on a 2 year trail basis……. then reverting back to standard means of determining opponents. If, after the trial period and a shift back to historical norms …….. if it was seen as a much better approach, then fine.
154 games obviously isn’t a radical change and if it buys some Goodwill with players, go ahead “in the name of player safety”😉.
3, “Best of 7” Series Wins to get a ring seems extensive! Used to be one Team from each league & that was it ……… now 6 Teams per League vying to move to the Series. To me, whether one likes it, depends upon if your team wins the first year or two the expanded # of games are tried. Do not need more games! The Division Series is fair for the Team with superior record and the opposition as well.
2 more Playoff games (potentially) per Series can’t move the Revenue Needle enough so it is a necessary change.