TopGunn22

Left hand hitters are not a big need for the Twins. Nate Lowe has been talked about, but for the Twins, Ty France is a much better fit and Cody Clemens is better than Nate Lowe.

In a negotiation, both sides get something they want, and both sides have to give something up they would rather not. At some point, the Players Union is going to have to "give" on something. The key is in "getting" something (maybe several "somethings") that makes what you eventually give up, worthwhile. The owners are focused on a salary cap. The players have always been 100% opposed. There will be change going forward. The Dodgers didn't win this year, but the current financial model needs a major revision. What will that be? TNtwins85 is right. There is probably some kind of formula the owners are basing their negotiation strategy on. I also have no idea what that is, but I think we ARE going to miss games, and there will be some sort of shortened Spring Training. I can't get into the mind of the owners, so I have no idea how much this will effect the off season.

When you look at the list and read the comments under each player it becomes obvious that with a hole at 1B, the Twins should be strongly considering Ty France. When he came to the Twins, he was considered a below average 1B. He had a solid season with the Glove and has since garnered Gold Glove recognition. He's really everything the Twins are looking for in a 1B for the short term. A Gold Glove caliber, 800+ hitting, right-handed swinging 1B. Add to this the fact that his contract should not be a back breaker and he completely fits the bill if he plays in 2027 similarly to what he's done in 2025 & 2026. Arozarena had the best season and would look good in the Twins OF, but with Buxton, Jenkins, Keaschall and E-Rod already 4 of the 5 projected OF'ers and 1B a bigger problem, France is the much more affordable option. Yes, Clemens can play some 1B, but I like him at 2B until Houston is ready for a promotion and Culpepper moves to 2B. Brandon Lowe would be an interesting guy in our lineup, but with the inevitable move of Culpepper to 2B and the heavier cost of Lowe, France makes the most sense to me.

It seems the Players are ALWAYS going to reject a Salary Cap system no matter what the owners suggest. So when could actual progress be made? I suggest that the owners propose increasing the major league roster by two players, thus creating 60 NEW Major League Baseball players. 60 more JOBS than existed in 2026. Rather than shuttling minor league pitchers and their families back and forth from their minor league home to a major league home ad nauseum, provide some stability for the families as well as the major league roster. Extend the 13 Pitcher limit to 15 and with 13 position players-a total of 28 players on a roster. Increase the Major League Minimum salary as well as the AAA minimum salary. There would probably need to be a lot more discussed obviously, but there will be absolutely ZERO progress if the Players are unwilling to consider anything that puts a Salary Cap and Floor in place. We've been fighting various iterations of this same battle since 1972. The Players Union isn't serving the Players fully if the only possible outcome of a Cap and Floor proposal, no matter what else is offered, is immediate and total rejection. Leadership for the Players Union should be putting together a wish list of all the things they would love to have...and be ready to leverage it in negotiations. Does the Players Union represent ALL the players...or just the top 5%??

Nicely Done Maddie ! Indeed, Byron Buxton is the John Snow of House Pohlad. Fitting we are The Nights Watch.

This IS going to get ugly, and I have to agree that I was surprised by MLB owners making such a seemingly generous offer. I say "seemingly" because I have no idea what each team's specific financial situation is, just that there are quite obvious HUGE gaps between what the Dodgers/Yankees spend on salary vs. what Cleveland or the Reds do. A few years ago, the Dodgers discovered they were were Godzilla. I'm not sure why it took so long and I'm not sure they will be willing to give up that hammer in their hand, but something needs to be done to close that gap and compel the Reds, Guardians, Twins and others to step it up from a payroll standpoint. But from a Public Relations standpoint, the owners have fired the first shot across the bough of the MLBPA and it seems to have put the MLBPA in a defensive posture. The response by the MLBPA's interim director was pretty weak.

Having #2 WOULD be really interesting. I'd love to get Roch. But I'm also very excited about Marek Houston. If we got Roch, he'd quite possibly have to move to 3rd with Houston's glove. But Roch is supposed to be Bobby Witt lite. (shrug shoulders). I think #3 is still O.K. for us and if the SS's go #1 & #2 I'd be happy with the Catcher from Georgia Tech.

Jamie, Thank You for this timely write-up. While Roch and Emerson remain a consistent #1 & #2, there are interesting changes taking place since last year's projections. The Twins sitting at #3 should get a shot at either the top Catcher or top Pitcher and maybe, just maybe, Emerson if something surprising happens at #2.

THIS is the A.L. Central. the Twins are projected to win 77 games. That is only SIX games behind the Division leaders. This means a couple of breaks here and there and as flawed as the Twins are, they could be in the thick of it for much of the season. A deadline deal or two for anybody but the White Sox could make a huge difference.

I was just talking about this with friends the other day. One of these friends is a die hard Yankee fan (he never was a Twins fan) who I have known since I was 5 years old. We played Little League baseball with and against each other. I have always been a Twins fan first, but determined when I was 7 years old that I had to have a 2nd favorite team and that it had to be a National League team. I required my little brother would do the same. After being totally impressed by Sandy Koufax in the 1965 World Series I determined he was my 2nd favorite player (Tony Oliva #1) and that the Dodgers would be my 2nd favorite team. My brother ultimately determined the St. Louis Cardinals would be his favorite non-Twins team and that Lou Brock was his "guy." Thus set the stage for my rivalry with the Yankees fan friend from that point onward. The Yankees quickly figured out the Brave New World of free agency could benefit them signing stars like Catfish Hunter and Reggie Jackson after a one-year stint with the Orioles. The Dodgers, who always prided themselves on home grown talent had no idea how to leverage free agency. Their first foray into it was signing Twins pitcher Dave Goltz after his 20-win 1977 season. Goltz was not Jim Palmer, Catfish, or Tom Seaver. He was a disaster for the Dodgers. Somewhere around the time the Dodgers traded for Mookie Betts, they started to unlock the massive advantages they had. Nothing they are doing is illegal. It didn't take until the Kyle Tucker signing to prove it to me. Signing Shohei Ohtani was the nuclear explosion that rocked MLB. Giving Tucker 4 years for $60 million a season was just the cherry on top. No, the Dodgers aren't doing anything they currently are allowed to do. But it exposes the foundational flaws in MLB's economic/financial framework. Until changes are implemented, the Dodgers will continue to dominate. I predict a 3rd straight World Series victory for them in 2026, a feat not accomplished since the Oakland A's did it in 1972. 1973 and 1974 in a time when there was no free agency. I wish I could say that I'm enjoying the Dodgers historic run. But I have to admit, I would have enjoyed a World Series win in 1966, 1977, 1978 and even in 1985 much more if they had been able to pull it off in those years listed. There is something hollow about seeing them win under the current conditions. I used to say no manager could do less with so much at his disposal than Dave Roberts. But his last 2-years has forced me to give him the credit he's due.